<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Awful patches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notes.xythian.net/2005/10/18/awful-patches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notes.xythian.net/2005/10/18/awful-patches/</link>
	<description>Links, technical notes, whatnot.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.notes.xythian.net/2005/10/18/awful-patches/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notes.xythian.net/2005/10/18/awful-patches/#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Given my experiences with NFS I completely understand ditching them.  I&#039;ve found them ok for hosting basic apps like wordpress and static content but I&#039;ve had nothing but problems dealing with their hosting environment.  It drives me crazy that I can&#039;t see the same system as the apache process and and troubleshooting involves a massive amount of, lets say creative, reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given my experiences with NFS I completely understand ditching them.  I&#8217;ve found them ok for hosting basic apps like wordpress and static content but I&#8217;ve had nothing but problems dealing with their hosting environment.  It drives me crazy that I can&#8217;t see the same system as the apache process and and troubleshooting involves a massive amount of, lets say creative, reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
